• Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    When I first heard that I was like… why? The “live” action Lion King got dogshit reviews and continuoisly clowned on.

    Then I found out it made 1.5 billion on a ~250 million budget and understood.

    Fuck the mouse tho

    • NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      One important note about the mouse shitting out live action remakes, they want to hold the copyright for as long as possible.

      They don’t care if Aladdin with Will Smith only makes a 10% return (Hollywood accounting), because they’ve renewed their claim on the IP and merchandising the blue corpse of Robin Williams Genie far exceeds any film profits. They make more than $5 billion per year just on licensing fees.

        • NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Winnie the Pooh isn’t an original Disney IP either. Yet if you put Pooh in a recognizably Disney style Pooh costume they’ll sue you. You can sell merch of shirtless Pooh all you like.

          It’s still protecting the Disney version of the IP. It’s why the live action remakes still share a visual language with the animated originals.

          You can make an Aladdin movie if you like. But god help you if there is a Blue Genie with characteristics recognizable to an objective observer as being similar to Genie®.

          Steamboat Willie is public domain, but Mickey Mouse® is not.

          That doesn’t mean Steamboat Willie is fair game either, Disney can still argue it’s a trademark, and likely will, since they’ve made it the new intro clip to every Disney IP.

          Here’s an writeup covering it in more depth, from The Carey School of Business at Johns Hopkins:

          https://carey.jhu.edu/articles/mickey-public-domain-copyright-holders