President Joe Biden announced Thursday $3 billion toward identifying and replacing theĀ nationā€™s unsafeĀ leadĀ pipes,Ā a long-sought move to improve public health and clean drinking waterĀ that will be paidĀ for by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law.

Biden unveiled the new fundingĀ in North Carolina, a battleground state Democrats have lost to Donald Trump in the past two presidential electionsĀ but are feeling more bullish toward due to an abortion measure on the stateā€™s ballot this November.

ā€¦

The Environmental Protection Agency will invest $3 billion in theĀ leadĀ pipe effort annually through 2026, Administrator Michael Regan told reporters. He said that nearly 50% of the funding will go to disadvantaged communities ā€“ and a fact sheet from the Biden administration noted that ā€œlead exposure disproportionately affects communities of color and low-income families.ā€

    • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      Ā·
      6 months ago

      Yes. šŸ˜• They were originally coated on the interior so there wasnā€™t direct exposure of the lead to the water. But lack of funding (in some cases deliberate, see Flint, MI) for maintenance leads to the coating wearing away, resulting in contamination of the water. Thereā€™s plenty of Starving The Beast going on with things like this (also see bridges collapsing and public schools failing) by conservatives to try and grift on replacing public infrastructure with private ownership. Pretty disgusting.

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        Ā·
        6 months ago

        Purely pedantically: the coating isnā€™t applied to the pipes, it forms there from a reaction between the water and the pipe material.
        Itā€™s not something that maintained by directly putting it on the pipes, but by managing the composition of the water supply, which they canā€™t not do.

        http://www.sedimentaryores.net/Pipe Scales/Lead Solubility.html

        The issue in Flint wasnā€™t that they cut maintenance funding, but that they cut water supply funding and so the utility switched from Detroit water (fine, stable and nice to pipes) to local river water which had a different acidity which destroyed the coating.

        I agree with all your conclusions, just wanted to let you know why weā€™re not constantly digging up pipes to fix the coating. šŸ˜Š

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      Ā·
      6 months ago

      Itā€™s actually not uncommon in industrialized countries, and a lot of countries have similar active projects to phase them out. Flint was a wake-up call to places outside the US as well, so everyone has been accelerating their efforts, since thereā€™s a good example of how bad a ā€œnormalā€ error can make things.

      Other countries donā€™t often have to advertise that their governments are doing their jobs as much as the US has, since they donā€™t have as much ā€œall public spending is wasteā€ rhetoric.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      Ā·
      6 months ago

      Itā€™s OK, theyā€™re only in places like Flint which is full of black people that nobody cares about, or Florida where everyone is already too brain damaged for anybody to really notice the difference.