• tlf@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Happy to hear that courts start calling these ruses out for what they are

  • MinFapper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Because it’s not effective? Or too effective? Haven’t read the article, but I’m guessing the former.

    • mindlesscrollyparrot
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because it only contains “credible policies in place for less than 20% of the emissions cuts needed”. The other 80% is all wishful thinking.