An Australian pilot was forced to take evasive action after a Chinese military jet detonated flares close to a Navy helicopter that was operating in international waters near South Korea.

The Defence Department has described the actions of the J-10 Chinese Air Force plane as “unsafe and unprofessional” following the incident which took place in the Yellow Sea over the weekend.

On Saturday a MH-60R Seahawk which had launched from HMAS Hobart was intercepted by the People’s Liberation Army-Air Force (PLA-AF) as it was taking part in a UN mission to enforce sanctions against North Korea.

  • Cypher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    You’re glad someone who cares about the safety of Australian citizens isn’t in power?

    Way to out yourself I guess.

    • fine_sandy_bottom
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      China is our largest trading partner. Last year we exported $220b of stuff to China. This year it will be closer to $250b.

      Second place is Japan, at a paltry $80b this year. That’s a third.

      • Cypher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        So your greedy and spineless solution is to allow these bullying tactics to continue until Australians are killed, and then continue to allow trade afterwards.

        • fine_sandy_bottom
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s not greedy to avoid catastrophic economic collapse.

          It’s not spineless to choose an appropriate response instead of having a hissy fit.

          You don’t protect Australians by acting like a tough guy.

          • Cypher@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            So full blown war over seeking alternative trading partners is a better outcome? Because that’s what will happen if Chinese aggression isn’t met with severe consequences.

            • fine_sandy_bottom
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Bullshit. Hyperbole.

              You talk about “seeking alternative trading partners” like we’re seeking alternative laundry powder at woolies.

              Who else will buy our iron ore who isn’t already? The answer is no one.

                • fine_sandy_bottom
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  You don’t seem to understand the type of damage it would do to discontinue our trade relationship with China.

                  It’s not just some company would lose a few million dollars in share value.

                  It would be economic collapse. Rolling blackouts, civil unrest, supply chain disruption, starvation, overwhelmed health services, no fuel, rioting, suburban gang violence, hyper inflation.

                  China would just be able to buy everything they don’t already own and take everything else.

                  Sometimes it takes courage to stare down an adversary, and not blink when they fire off a few scary flares.

                  • Cypher@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Blackouts in the country that is an energy exporter.

                    Starvation in a food exporter.

                    Shows what you know about economics.