• danielton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Exactly. So many browser developers adopted it because it’s open-source and eliminated the work of having to build the rendering engine.

    Meanwhile, Google is basically dictating the future of the Web because of this. Web developers are only testing on Chrome, and Google is about to kill ad blockers on every browser except Firefox and Safari because they control the rendering engine. What else are you gonna do?

    “lol just download Chrome!”

    • Laxaria@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The extensive reach of Chromium is usually a bit understated too. For example, Chromium is what powers all Electron applications., and as much as we want to gripe about the nightmare Electron has enabled, it still has wide reach. Building for Electron means building for Chromium, and building for Chromium often entails leveraging what is available in Chrome/Electron/etc over what is standard. These frequently overlap, but when they don’t, the blame is then placed on the browser rather than on the website (i.e. why doesn’t XYZ work on Firefox, when the reason is the website developer chose not to test/ensure it does work).

      This gets very funny in some situations where visiting a website in Firefox throws a “not supported” page but switching the user-string to Chrome/Chromium results in the same website working just fine.