• iAmTheTot@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yes?
            My comment should not be read as “the violence has already begun and ended, and no more will occur” but rather more like “we are past the point at which violence has begun”. I was implying that violence is not inevitable, it’s already here.

            • massacre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              No offense, but then “happening” would have been more appropriate. The other commenter is correct about “happened” being past tense as in… it’s over. Or you could have used “has happened” which leaves a bit of room for future violence. But this is pedantry at it’s best - you’re intent having been acknowledged. :)

      • ShortFuse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Worse: From a random citizen that was tried in a court of law and found guilty. The governor used his powers to claim absolution (or worser still: justification).

    • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      In this context your comment means the violent from protestors/revolutionaries has already happened. That’s why everyone’s confused and asking for clarification