• ⸻ Ban DHMO 🇦🇺 ⸻@aussie.zoneOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    > And the two sources you cite are overwhelmingly white male

    what sources??

    Edit: nevermind worked it out

    Yeah AI companies are being stupid using Reddit, Twitter and StackExchange, but there’s no magic fix to get more diverse AI. Would they need to pay people of underrepresented groups to write training material? Is that racist? Why should they get paid when everyone else is doing it for free?

    I don’t think they were being intentionally racist when they made the dictionaries for auto-correct - the article says it only accounts for around 41% of English names - but most modern auto-correct things on phones at least seem to add words to your dictionary if you use them a lot, and they’ve probably been limited by file size requirements in the past.

    • Ilandar@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s an example of structural/systemic/societal racism. Western industrialised civilisation has been developed and led by white men for hundreds of years - the inherent bias that comes from that often ends up discriminating against and disenfranchising non-white, non-male people in society without anyone deliberately intending it. Another way to think about it is that white men experience a higher level of privilege by default than any other group in Western society. As a white man, I have the privilege of my name being included (or being more likely to be included) by default in one of these dictionaries.