More efficient manufacturing, falling battery costs and intense competition are lowering sticker prices for battery-powered models to within striking distance of gasoline cars.

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    It’s not a hard limit, it’s a variable capacity reduction over a decade that estimates a maximum 50% reduction in range, similar to the lost efficiency of an ICE engine as the tubes , pipes and cases erode.

    You add in the far lower fuel/repair/ maintenance costs and that optional new battery is costing you less than you’re paying in gasoline, oil changes or other basic and common maintenance.

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      I drove Camry for 15 years with minimal repairs and after 180k miles I was still getting roughly the same mpg and range as when it was new. It was still going fine when I got rid of it becuae our vehicle needs changed, but even if it hadn’t a complete engine rebuild at 300k (if needed) would only be a few thousand dollars or less.

      Working down to half the range over a decade and then needing a very expensive repalacement battery is not comparable in any way. I really hope the battery tech keeps improving.

      • eltrain123@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’ve got 112k miles on my Tesla and still get over 250miles on a full charge, and that’s not running it to empty… just as far as I push it on a road trip. I could probably make it 275-285 easy. Never had a problem with range and have had minimal maintenance costs compared to all of the ICE vehicles I drove over 20years I drove ‘em.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s comparable in that optional battery maintenance is currently the same price as the average cost of repairs you made on your Camry plus the cost of gas for a decade.

        Even if battery tech weren’t simultaneously improving and getting cheaper every couple of months, ev costs are already at least comparable with ICEs.

        As battery tech improves and efficiency rises, the price is going to keep getting cheaper.

        • snooggums@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          I wasn’t talking about cost, I was talking about the ability to travel a comparable range on a charge. Does battery maintenance keep it at 95% of the original range at 15 years?

          Less maintenance and cheaper charging is actually a selling point for electric cars, and I am not disagreeing with that. But a used 15 year old car that has a far lower range than new and will most likely need a new expensive battery replacment within a few years is not the same as a 15 year old car that performs like new and won’t need a massive repair in the near future.

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            No more than ICEs stay at 95% of the original range at 15 years.

            Your argument is based on accepting a hypothetical best case scenario for a random ICE to the worst case scenario for a random EV.

            “A used 15-year-old ICE car with a cracked head gasket isn’t the same compared to an electric car that’s managed to retain near its full capacity”.

            No, of course it isn’t.

            EVs are already cheaper over time, are already comparable at MSRP, and their range and efficiency isn’t static like ICE cars.

            Range anxiety is real, but it boils down to anxiety; range is still there and only improving.

            Shoot, the aptera is going to recharge passively from solar 40 miles a day, and they have thousand mile ranges on a charge.

            In fuel costs alone, an EV owner is saving about $1,000 a year.

            After a decade, you can get that extra 20% capacity back with a new battery for cheaper than you would have been spending on your ICE car that cannot be refurbished in the same way.

            Just adds up.

            • snooggums@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              No more than ICEs stay at 95% of the original range at 15 years.

              Your argument is based on accepting a hypothetical best case scenario for a random ICE to the worst case scenario for a random EV.

              Based on my last two cars apparently being hypothetical best case scenarios, sure.

              I look forward to electric cars range continuing to improve, but as long as I live somewhere that range actually matters half of the year I’ll take the current ranges as they work in reality into consideration.

              • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Naturally.

                Most people appreciate innovation after it becomes common rather than when it becomes practical.

                If your 15-year-old cars have the same MPG and have never needed a repair, yes, your cars are performing to a degree that has never been recorded.