“Study of the moon is not the goal,” said Vitaly Egorov, a popular Russian space analyst. “The goal is political competition between two superpowers — China and the USA — and a number of other countries which also want to claim the title of space superpower.”

  • Simulation6@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t question Russian science or engineering, but is this project going to run into the same sorts of issues their war has?

    • Emet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Roscosmos has been one of the better run Russian agencies, mostly due to the fact that they’re using old but extremely proven technology from the Soviet era

      • Zoboomafoo@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think this mission is their desperate attempt to have a success so Putin doesn’t draft half their workforce and tell the rest to start launching Soyuz rockets at Ukranian preschools

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Considering levels of corruption in the last few years and hard brain drain I guess Russian space exploration is doomed. Thanks, Putin!

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No Russia beat the us in almost every metric for space flight, we got to the moon first and that’s all anyone remembers.

      They’re a lot of things but their space program is pretty boss.

      You can downvote but it will still be just at true.

        • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          America and our German scientists, and Russia and their German scientists…

          Let’s not act like operation paperclip wasn’t a rat race for both.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          They didn’t steal German tech, Germany caused two worlds wars and war prizes were taken including technology and scientists.

          • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Setting aside the fact that looting a country you beat in a war is still very much stealing, Germany didn’t cause the great war and if you understood an iota of history you’d realize that. Did they use it to advance their own causes and take land/resources? Yeah. Pretty much the standard MO for every country that’s ever been in a war, though. Weird to single them out for their actions in WW1 in that regard.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure and that was iirc a mismatch error between the station and pod. Russian parts connect to Russian parts pretty well, connecting them to anything else is… Iffy.

      • nexusband@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can downvote but it will still be just at true.

        No, it isn’t. Space Shuttle for one thing, many Telescopes, Sat’s…and so on. Russia hasn’t done shit. Even the ISS Modules from Russia are crap and the ones that make the most problems.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The space shuttle was 30 years after the space race homie. Also incorrect, NASA itself disagrees that it was Russia alone at fault.