The US just invested more than $1 billion into carbon removal / The move represents a big step in the effort to suck CO2 out of the atmosphere—and slow down climate change.::undefined

  • BackupRainDancer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Amen, only angle I can see someone disagreeing with is trees becoming a potential bank of carbon to be fed back into the atmosphere via fuel for wildfires.

    I so wish there were better ways to control forest fires.

    • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Forest fires do contribute to CO2 emissions, but naturally occurring forest fires are part of the carbon sequestration cycle. The ash, and charcoal leftover from forest fires trap carbon and provide for nutrients for the next forest.

      It’s not great to have half a continent burn at once, but regular, controlled fires are a net sink for carbon.

    • Bloody Harry@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      But even if they do die, if you always make sure to have enough trees alive, it’ll be a net zero.

      Also, I’m wondering that no company has started investigating to bury trees into abandoned coal mines yet. Like, take one, give back one for using a few hundred thousand years later.

      • beaubbe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        How would a company make money by dumping trees in holes?

        It should be a government effort to do something like this. At least planting trees, no need to cut them for decades anyway. We would need an insane amount of tress for that to work too, basically as many as we burned as oil since the industrial era…

        • Bloody Harry@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s this concept of CO2 trading in europe. Basically a very dirty compania buys certificates from cleaner ones (or CO2 negative companies, like that hypothetical tree burying company). These allow dirtycorp. to pollute the air, while giving clean Inc. the ability and the monetary resources to pull CO2 from the air.

          • beaubbe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Interesting! In Canada we have a carbon tax, which incentivize companies to pollute less, but does not help companies that are carbon-negative. I like the european way better; but as I stated, it requires governments to manage this, as these certificates are a fictous constraint anyway.