• deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 days ago

    Gonna disagree with you there. If the mission is to run 1990s apps, we need a 32bit x86 CPU.

    • 555@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      I have windows 3.1 running in an emulator faster than that eras hardware could ever dream. So, gonna have to double disagree.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        Faster isn’t always better – there’s software from the era that relied on hardware limitations to throttle itself – but I’d think that emulators probably have pretty good support for such throttling.

      • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        If someone wanted emulation, wouldn’t they have bought one of the many other tiny laptops that have been on the market for years?

        I think the point of this is to run natively on vintage hardware.