• thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    My scenario is that I use chatgpt to get context and terminology in the area I’m researching.

    I then know how to do more specific Google searches (only 1/2).

      • thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I guess it adds up to 12 searches worth of environmental impact with chatgpt+Google (10 searches worth from chatgpt, 2 from Google)

        When I use Google alone it’s often the same as that if not more. Sometimes it’s less if I already know the subject matter, but in those scenarios I would usually give just Google a go first anyway.

        Basically chatgpt often either gives me the answer or a much better starting place for what to Google.

        • Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I don’t understand the chatgpt bit still. When you say you need more context on the subject matter, you could search for the wiki or a forum and get the same information chatgpt is pulling without the impact.

          • thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            you could search for the wiki or a forum and get the same information chatgpt is pulling without the impact.

            True, depending on the quality of the wiki/forum. I would then also often find myself defaulting back to Google to find the right page on the wiki/forum, just with the name of the forum included to narrow down my search.

            That or I’d never find the exact bit of info I need because it’s buried in hours worth of reading on the wiki.