Posadas [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net to the_dunk_tank@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year agoChina seeks food security, but at what cost?hexbear.netimagemessage-square382fedilinkarrow-up1303arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1303arrow-down1imageChina seeks food security, but at what cost?hexbear.netPosadas [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net to the_dunk_tank@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square382fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareedge [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up79·1 year agoLenin dismissed the Economist as “a journal which speaks for British millionaires”.
minus-squarejackmarxist [any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up49·1 year agoWell he must be feeling stupid now since the economist exclusively speaks for Billionaires
minus-squareCatradora_Stalinism [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 year agoLenin is done for
minus-squareProfessorAdonisCnut [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up41·1 year agoIt’s amazing that the only part of that which has shifted at all is the wealth level implied by ‘millionaire’
minus-squaremotherfucker [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·1 year agoLenin’s pithy prose* *adjusted for inflation
Lenin dismissed the Economist as “a journal which speaks for British millionaires”.
Well he must be feeling stupid now since the economist exclusively speaks for Billionaires
Lenin is done for
deleted by creator
It’s amazing that the only part of that which has shifted at all is the wealth level implied by ‘millionaire’
Lenin’s pithy prose*
*adjusted for inflation