Emotional_Series7814@kbin.melroy.org to dailygames@lemmy.zip · 4 months agoLinxicon 144: "ingredient" to "living"linxicon.comexternal-linkmessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up16arrow-down1external-linkLinxicon 144: "ingredient" to "living"linxicon.comEmotional_Series7814@kbin.melroy.org to dailygames@lemmy.zip · 4 months agomessage-square15fedilinkfile-text
Game #144 Shortest path: 3 (Avg. 5.5) Total words: 4 (Avg. 11.8) 🟦🟪🟥 | 🔥 2 https://linxicon.com #Linxicon
minus-squareMicrowavedTea@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up3·4 months ago how frequently the words appear near each other That’s what I thought for yesterday’s puzzle and tried “final” and “version” but apparently there was no connection between them. I guess if you keep playing you’ll start learning the dataset too.
minus-squarejollinkfedilinkarrow-up3·4 months agoOne thing I misunderstood is that it’s not about how close they are semantically, but in meaning. It’s subtle.
minus-squareperishthethought@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 months agoI just played for the first time and got: Game #144 Shortest path: 3 (Avg. 3) Total words: 3 (Avg. 3) 🟦🟪🟥 | 🔥 1 I must have just got lucky with the word I chose: >!food!<
minus-squarelemonmelon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 months agoInterestingly, I chose the same word that you did. But the direct connection to “living” seems to be a stretch.
That’s what I thought for yesterday’s puzzle and tried “final” and “version” but apparently there was no connection between them. I guess if you keep playing you’ll start learning the dataset too.
One thing I misunderstood is that it’s not about how close they are semantically, but in meaning. It’s subtle.
I just played for the first time and got:
Game #144
Shortest path: 3 (Avg. 3)
Total words: 3 (Avg. 3)
🟦🟪🟥 | 🔥 1
I must have just got lucky with the word I chose: >!food!<
Interestingly, I chose the same word that you did. But the direct connection to “living” seems to be a stretch.