Donald Trump and 18 others are indicted on counts that include racketeering, perjury and theft.

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/2916091

Former US President Donald Trump has been charged with attempting to overturn his 2020 election loss in the state of Georgia.

He and 18 others have been indicted on counts that include racketeering in a 41-charge document issued by a Fulton County grand jury.

The indictment marks the fourth time Mr Trump has been criminally charged this year.

He has denied the accusations in all cases.

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis launched an investigation in February 2021 into allegations of election meddling against Mr Trump and his associates.

The list of defendants indicted late on Monday night includes former Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani, former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, former White House lawyer John Eastman and a former justice department official, Jeffrey Clark.

The indictment says the alleged co-conspirators “knowingly and willfully joined a conspiracy to unlawfully change the outcome of the election in favor of Trump”.

The charge sheet also refers to the defendants as a “criminal organization”, accusing them of a number of crimes, including:

False statements and writings
Impersonating a public officer
Forgery
Filing false documents
Influencing witnesses
Computer trespass
Conspiracy to defraud the state
Theft and perjury.

The most serious charge, violating the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (Rico) Act, is punishable by a maximum of 20 years in prison.

The act - designed to help take down organised criminal syndicates like the mafia - helps prosecutors connect the dots between underlings who broke laws and those who gave them marching orders.

  • Brokkr@lemmy.world
    23·
    11 months ago

    The presumption of innocence is really important because it reduces the chance for abusing the prosecutorial process (of course that does still happen). Prosecutors must show beyond a reasonable doubt that a person is guilty. That’s a high bar to clear, but it gets easier when the defendant builds you a staircase.

    Every defendant deserves the right to plead guilty, even this criminal.

    • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
      2·
      11 months ago

      That’s what I mean by “presumption of innocence”, yes.

      Does the presumption of innocence still apply even if the crime has already been confirmed to have happened?

      If someone steals a candy bar right in front of a clerk on camera and gets arrested and for some reason the case goes to trial, can they still plead not guilty?

      Even though that crinee is confirmed to have been perpetrated by that person?

      What are they circumstances under which the presumption of innocence is waived or forfeited?

      • Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social
        15·
        11 months ago

        Does the presumption of innocence still apply even if the crime has already been confirmed to have happened?

        Yes. The crime (and the criminal) legally hasn’t been “confirmed”. The point of a trial is to “confirm” it.

        For example, there’s probably at least 50 million people who believe no crime occurred.

        They’re WRONG, of course, but the point of the trial is to prove them wrong.

        • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
          1·
          11 months ago

          Got it now, thanks.

          I had it in my head that there was some way to forfeit that presumption of innocence, but couldn’t imagine what that way was.

          But apparently there is not. Thanks

      • Default_Defect@midwest.socialEnglish
        10·
        11 months ago

        Yes, because theoretically someone that strongly resembles the candy bar stealer got mixed up in the whole deal and got arrested instead. I get where you’re coming from, but being able to defend yourself no matter what is a good thing.

    • Taako_Tuesday@lemmy.ca
      13·
      11 months ago

      I think you mean plead innocent. I mean everyone deserves both, but in this case there’s no doubt trump’s got the right to plead guilty

      • Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social
        6·
        11 months ago

        There’s no such thing as pleading innocent. The court will either find you guilty or not guilty. The court will not, and in fact cannot, find you innocent. Only not guilty. Or in most cases, “not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt”.