roadsidewildflower@midwest.social to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 5 months agoPenance (21/100)midwest.socialimagemessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up1519arrow-down10
arrow-up1519arrow-down1imagePenance (21/100)midwest.socialroadsidewildflower@midwest.social to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-squaremsage@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoSo instead of ‘for’ you could use ‘because of’ and it would be almost perfect.
So instead of ‘for’ you could use ‘because of’ and it would be almost perfect.