• kautau@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    That’s pretty interesting, thanks for sharing. It probably also has to do with a more strict balance of power. Our president is now our king, but really it’s only the presidential election that has constant campaigning for the next election. It’s ok now though, we’ll no longer need that, as our king will choose the next one

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Our president is now our king, but really it’s only the presidential election that has constant campaigning for the next election.

      This isn’t really true. Campaigning takes up a large amount of time for even house members. They have two year terms and they spend much of that fending off primary challenges and then campaigning for the general election.

      • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s also not true because, in England/the UK, at least, the King was established as not being above the law by the Magna Carta and when Charles I tried to dispute that they cut his head off. The autocracy that the USA is setting up is far worse than a monarchy.

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Maybe that’s internal? I don’t see much house or senate campaigning until the months lead up to the elections (ad spends, yard signs, rallies, etc) though I will agree they are likely working on it the whole time

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s portions internal for sure, but yeah it’s happening the whole time basically. Increasingly all elections are becoming nationalized and about national issues rather than something about the actual locality being “served”.

          Most house politicians spend all of the time they aren’t in Washington doing fundraising and other campaign related activities. Some (like AOC) try to actually help their communities during these times and fundraise or organize on that basis.

          • kautau@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Makes sense. I wish more politicians would combine fundraising or organizing with ways to help those they were voted to represent.

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      but really it’s only the presidential election that has constant campaigning for the next election.

      Uhh… No. Senators and representatives have been complaining for a while now the moment they get elected they have to start fundraising for their next election cause money is the only indicator of a win. Oligarchy rules.