Whatever Harris did as a prosecutor seems reasonable given both the context of the time she during which was a prosecutor, and her overall political alignment. I would rather have a progressive presidential candidate like Bernie (too late), or AOC (maybe 2028 or later). But choosing Harris means that the overall āliberalā agenda stays on the table
Some highlights from the article
Harris, as part of her previous presidential campaign, also released a criminal justice reform plan that seeks to scale back incarceration, end the death penalty and solitary confinement, ban private prisons, and get rid of cash bail. Biden also backs a fairly aggressive criminal justice reform plan, despite his own mixed record on criminal justice issues.
A close examination of Harrisās record shows itās filled with contradictions. She pushed for programs that helped people find jobs instead of putting them in prison, but also fought to keep people in prison even after they were proved innocent. She refused to pursue the death penalty against a man who killed a police officer, but also defended Californiaās death penalty system in court. She implemented training programs to address police officersā racial biases, but also resisted calls to get her office to investigate certain police shootings.
But what seem like contradictions may reflect a balancing act. Harrisās parents worked on civil rights causes, and she came from a background well aware of the excesses of the criminal justice system ā but in office, she played the role of a prosecutor and Californiaās lawyer. She started in an era when ātough on crimeā politics were popular across party lines ā but she rose to national prominence as criminal justice reform started to take off nationally. She had an eye on higher political office as support for criminal justice reform became de rigueur for Democrats ā but she still had to work as Californiaās top law enforcement official.
Harris also pushed for more systemic reforms. Her most successful program as district attorney, āBack on Track,ā allowed first-time drug offenders, including drug dealers, to get a high school diploma and a job instead of prison time. Adams, Harrisās previous spokesperson, noted that the program started in 2005, āwhen most prosecutors were using a ātough on crimeā approach.ā
I gave 4 potential candidates I would support.
You gave two that were too old, one you wouldnāt hate, one who might beat Trump, one you liked, and one you thought was āinteresting.ā
Idk man. I love progressive stuff; more than Harris (or for that matter better than Biden) sounds great. Iām gonna like something that sounds like promoting that outcome. I hate the idea of Trump winning the election. Iām gonna dislike something that seems to promote that outcome, which includes shitting on the extremely-presumptive nominee without some kind of alternate plan to replace her with that is more solid than a long unenthusiastic list of candidates at varying levels of wild unrealisticness who are āinterestingā.
(I also predicted this like just recently like days ago - that the instant Biden was replaced with Harris, we were gonna get a big drumbeat of āoh actually Harris isnāt good enough, we need to dump her, not to replace her with anyone in particular, just, you know, the whole PROSECUTOR thing, you knowā¦ā)
So what youāre saying is that you already knew she was a problematic and unpopular choice but you are going to accuse anyone who voices that of supporting baby rape because you think any attempt to find a better candidate helps Trump. I think forcing a bad choice without any level of discussion helps Trump but I still donāt think you support baby rape.
Iām saying that:
Seems fair?
Until and unless someone steps up to challenge her and we know who is willing to throw their hat in the ring we canāt really support a specific candidate. All we have is speculation and who Iād like. Blind loyalty and immediately falling in line obscures the true picture for how much support she has and makes it less likely that a challenger will step forward. We need a real conversation about Harrisās candidacy and to know if anyone will challenge her for the nomination. Elizabeth Warren is who I want with Bernie as my second choice but I donāt see either of them as a real possibility because of their age. Letās see if someone closer to them is willing to fight for the nomination before falling in line.
Wasnāt aware I was āfalling in line.ā Thatās a very weird and specific characterization.