Whatever Harris did as a prosecutor seems reasonable given both the context of the time she during which was a prosecutor, and her overall political alignment. I would rather have a progressive presidential candidate like Bernie (too late), or AOC (maybe 2028 or later). But choosing Harris means that the overall āliberalā agenda stays on the table
Some highlights from the article
Harris, as part of her previous presidential campaign, also released a criminal justice reform plan that seeks to scale back incarceration, end the death penalty and solitary confinement, ban private prisons, and get rid of cash bail. Biden also backs a fairly aggressive criminal justice reform plan, despite his own mixed record on criminal justice issues.
A close examination of Harrisās record shows itās filled with contradictions. She pushed for programs that helped people find jobs instead of putting them in prison, but also fought to keep people in prison even after they were proved innocent. She refused to pursue the death penalty against a man who killed a police officer, but also defended Californiaās death penalty system in court. She implemented training programs to address police officersā racial biases, but also resisted calls to get her office to investigate certain police shootings.
But what seem like contradictions may reflect a balancing act. Harrisās parents worked on civil rights causes, and she came from a background well aware of the excesses of the criminal justice system ā but in office, she played the role of a prosecutor and Californiaās lawyer. She started in an era when ātough on crimeā politics were popular across party lines ā but she rose to national prominence as criminal justice reform started to take off nationally. She had an eye on higher political office as support for criminal justice reform became de rigueur for Democrats ā but she still had to work as Californiaās top law enforcement official.
Harris also pushed for more systemic reforms. Her most successful program as district attorney, āBack on Track,ā allowed first-time drug offenders, including drug dealers, to get a high school diploma and a job instead of prison time. Adams, Harrisās previous spokesperson, noted that the program started in 2005, āwhen most prosecutors were using a ātough on crimeā approach.ā
I am hopeful she has changed since her days as a prosecutor.
I am sad that I have no other choice.
So, she was literally reflecting the will of the voters with some of her decisions. Given that, I think her choices make sense.
Emphasis mine
Yeah thatās not really what Iām worried about.
Admittedly this is from her time as an Attorney General, not a prosecutor, but that was more recent and therefore more worrying to me:
āHarrisās office launched into a campaign of all-out obstruction, refusing to answer why they could not simply release low-risk, nonviolent inmates to conform to the Supreme Courtās request."
From: https://prospect.org/justice/how-kamala-harris-fought-to-keep-nonviolent-prisoners-locked-up/
Bias rating: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-american-prospect/
All that to say, I want her as my president. This is just a pretty big stain on her record, and I hope she has continued to grow and change so that the Harris we see today isnāt the Harris that would fight to keep people in prison at any cost.