YouTube starts mass takedowns of videos promoting “harmful or ineffective” cancer cures
www.theverge.com
It’s attempting to streamline its health moderation policies.

YouTube starts mass takedowns of videos promoting ‘harmful or ineffective’ cancer cures | The platform will also take action against videos that discourage people from seeking professional medical …::YouTube will remove content about harmful or ineffective cancer treatments or which “discourages viewers from seeking professional medical treatment.”

    • skillissuerEnglish
      91·
      1 year ago

      if you want to determine efficacy of a treatment, you run a clinical trial, not a debate

        • XTL@sopuli.xyzEnglish
          2·
          1 year ago

          Reader described experiencing mild discomfort but no visible signs of cancer.

        • skillissuerEnglish
          42·
          1 year ago

          that’s why we have peer review, replications, editorial standards and so on, if something’s funky with your paper you get a retraction. generally scientific method got pretty good at getting better description of reality over time

            • skillissuerEnglish
              41·
              1 year ago

              science from 200 years ago is not the same thing as we have now ffs

              now, and at basically any point from past hundred years or so, when scientific method was reasonably widely adopted, this method is a tool to avoid repeating mistakes like this

              and at any rate it doesn’t mean that random snake oil peddler, in this case “traditional medicine” flavoured, is more trustworthy than state of the art evidence based medicine, just because science made mistakes in the (distant) past