The bills target trans kids and one will make discussions of LGBTQ+ people in schools much more difficult. LGBTQ+ advocates spoke out against the bills, saying that they mandated discrimination against trans children.
I think that’s what the governor wants too (especially since leaving people alone and letting them make their own choices is a big part of the state’s identity). He’s not the one proposing these laws; he’s just picking his battles.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I think that in New Hampshire, only amendment to the state constitution can be voted on directly that way. Or do you mean that the voters should decide in the sense that each voter should be able to decide for himself rather than there being a law?
leaving people alone and letting them make their own choices is a big part of the state’s identity
Evidently not. They’re all talk, just like people in Texas who say the same thing while they vote for more government interference in the most intimate parts of people’s lives.
I think that’s what the governor wants too (especially since leaving people alone and letting them make their own choices is a big part of the state’s identity). He’s not the one proposing these laws; he’s just picking his battles.
So he’s a coward and an enabler who should be removed.
Removed by the voters for enabling the voters?
Maybe it’s the voters who should decide these issues, rather than a handful of representatives (who don’t truly represent the people).
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I think that in New Hampshire, only amendment to the state constitution can be voted on directly that way. Or do you mean that the voters should decide in the sense that each voter should be able to decide for himself rather than there being a law?
Evidently not. They’re all talk, just like people in Texas who say the same thing while they vote for more government interference in the most intimate parts of people’s lives.