“We believe the prerequisite for meaningful diplomacy and real peace is a stronger Ukraine, capable of deterring and defending against any future aggression,” Blinken said in a speech in Finland, which recently became NATO’s newest member and shares a long border with Russia.

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh I’m sorry, your shithole country is only occupying Syria without having officially incorporated the regions you’re pillaging. That makes it totally different. 🤡

    • FlowVoid@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, it does. It means that the US is among the countries that gave up using force to alter its boundaries, whereas Russia is not among them.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s right, instead US just comes and occupies countries whenever it feels like. Totally different though. 🤡

        • FlowVoid@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Many countries, including Russia, just come and occupy countries whenever they feel like.

          Actual annexation is what makes Russia the greater evil.

            • FlowVoid@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              Russia has far more blood on its hands than the US, starting with almost 6 million in Ukraine alone.

                  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    11
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Perhaps, educate yourself on what actual historians have to say on the subject.

                    https://www.jstor.org/stable/2500600

                    During the 1932 Holodomor Famine, the USSR sent aid to affected regions in an attempt to alleviate the famine. According to Mark Tauger in his article, The 1932 Harvest and the Famine of 1933:

                    While the leadership did not stop exports, they did try to alleviate the famine. A 25 February 1933 Central Committee decree allotted seed loans of 320,000 tons to Ukraine and 240,000 tons to the northern Caucasus. Seed loans were also made to the Lower Volga and may have been made to other regions as well. Kul’chyts’kyy cites Ukrainian party archives showing that total aid to Ukraine by April 1933 actually exceeded 560,000 tons, including more than 80,000 tons of food

                    Some bring up massive grain exports during the famine to show that the Soviet Union exported food while Ukraine starved. This is fallacious for a number of reasons, but most importantly of all the amount of aid that was sent to Ukraine alone actually exceeded the amount that was exported at the time.

                    Aid to Ukraine alone was 60 percent greater than the amount exported during the same period. Total aid to famine regions was more than double exports for the first half of 1933.

                    According to Tauger, the reason why more aid was not provided was because of the low harvest

                    It appears to have been another consequence of the low 1932 harvest that more aid was not provided: After the low 1931, 1934, and 1936 harvests procured grain was transferred back to peasants at the expense of exports.

                    Tauger is not a communist, and ultimately this specific article takes the view that the low harvest was caused by collectivization (he factors in the natural causes of the famine in later articles, based on how he completely neglects to mention weather in this article at all its clear that his position shifted over the years). However, the fact is that the Soviets really did try to alleviate the famine as best as they could.

                    On the other hand, we can look at what an actual intentional genocide looks like where Europeans massacred so many indigenous people in North America that it changed the climate!

                    https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/national/article225350745.html

                    Not to mention such hits as the Irish and Bengal famines.