Joe Biden will not be the Democratic nominee in Novemberā€™s presidential election, thankfully. He is not withdrawing because heā€™s being held responsible for enabling war crimes against the Palestinian people (though a recent poll does have nearly 40 percent of Americans saying theyā€™re less likely to vote for him thanks to his handling of the war). Yet itā€™s impossible to extricate the collapse in public faith in the Biden campaign from the ā€œuncommittedā€ movement for Gaza. They were the first people to refuse him their votes, and defections from within the presidentā€™s base hollowed out his support well in advance of the debate.

The Democrats and their presumptive nominee Kamala Harris are faced with a choice: On the one hand, they can continue Bidenā€™s monstrous support for Netanyahu, the brutal IDF, and Israelā€™s genocide of Palestinians. That would help allow the party to cover for Biden and put a positive spin on a smooth handoff, even though we all know this would mainly benefit the embittered president himself and his small coterie of loyalists. Such a choice would confirm that the institutional rot that allowed the current situation to develop still characterizes the party.

  • subversive_dev@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    Ā·
    3 months ago

    I wouldnā€™t personally go with ā€œJewish Moneyā€ as the terminologyā€¦šŸ˜¬

    That aside, certainly the effect of AIPAC and friends is a part of the pathology. That doesnā€™t change the fact that Joe Biden could end the genocide anytime he wanted. The Zionist entity cannot survive without US hard power backing.

    • FenrirIII@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      Ā·
      3 months ago

      I mean, it comes from people who identify as Jewish and who support the state of Israel. How is that not correct?

      Joe Biden cannot stop Israel. They have openly and repeatedly made known their plan to conquer Gaza. Theyā€™re already allowing ā€œsettlersā€ (terrorists) in to attack the local Palestinians and steal their land. American citizens, including many who donate to AIPAC, are getting involved in land deals for the conquered territory.

      The entire powerbase of the western world is either taking part in the genocide and/or profiting from it or unable to do the right thing because of the political and financial power of the former.

      Even if that wasnā€™t the case, Israel is the only friendly nation in the middle east for western powers. Iran regularly starts shit and Saudi Arabia committed 9/11 (which we ignore because they have oil). A Jewish state is much friendlier to the (mostly white, Christian) government of the US.

      • subversive_dev@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        Ā·
        3 months ago

        Joe Biden could order a blockade on the single functioning port. Joe Bidenā€™s Treasury department could instantly destroy the occupier economy with sanctions, as they should be doing under US and international law. Joe Biden could signal to the Iranians and Hezbollah that Israel is no longer allowed to operate with impunity.

        Donā€™t make the mistake of confusing pretend impotence for true impotence.

        I agree that the entire West is complicit in the genocide.

        Regarding ā€œfriendly nations,ā€ what happened to make the Iranians unfriendly to the United States?