Poor Terry Matalas. Itā€™s clear from numerous post-season interviews that, for as elaborate as S3 became by the end (rebuilding the Enterprise-D! Bringing back Ro and Tuvok! Changelings and Borg and Lore!), his original vision was yet more elaborate. Apparently he originally planned to have Janeway and Kim also appear, and to show Ro still alive in the brig with Tuvok at the end of the season. The man clearly was dreaming big.

Given that, it seems slightly implausible that he would omit material purely out of carelessness. And the absence of Alexander seems like a pretty large omission ā€“ especially in a season that was so focused on the parent-child relationship and the idea of ā€œthe next generationā€. Yes, there are all these memes about Worf forgetting Alexander, but that doesnā€™t strike me as the kind of fan service Matalas was going for.

From a storytelling perspective, omitting Alexander seems pretty similar to why Odo was mentioned adoringly as ā€œa man of honorā€ but not named: there was already a lot of backstory and reference being woven into the story, and throwing out a random name ā€“ or a random concept like, ā€œOh yeah, Worf has an estranged sonā€ ā€“ would create too much to unpack.

Likewise, it seems like they wanted Worf to have a paternal presence with Raffi, so omitting Alexander simplified that story.

But still: in a season that was all about parents and their children, it seems significant that they couldnā€™t find any way to reference him.

Unlessā€¦

Worf has a memorable scene with Raffi where he tells her, ā€œDonā€™t presume to know what I have sacrificedā€ (or something to that effect). Surprisingly, that line is never followed up onā€¦ explicitly.

But I suggest that that is where we learn of Alexanderā€™s fate: Worf has lost his son. Whether to death or desertion or deep undercover work, who can say? But we have an open question ā€“ where is Alexander? ā€“ and we have a vague statement that is never otherwise explained ā€“ that Worf has sacrificed a great deal ā€“ and given how much the rest of the season ties itself together, I suspect this was meant to be a subtle nod to explain away Alexanderā€™s absence.

Why not make it explicit? Why doesnā€™t Worf tell anyone about Alexander? I argue itā€™s because they wanted to save the ā€œgrieving parentā€ story for Riker + Troi, especially Riker. Explicitly portraying both Riker and Worf as grieving fathers would create an elephant in the room too big to ignore, and wouldā€™ve taken up much more space in the story.

So, instead, poor Alexander is consigned to a mysterious comment from his father ā€“ perhaps fodder for some future tie-in novel, or perhaps someone we might meet in Star Trek: Legacy.

Are there other theories as to where Alexander might be, or why the writers did not mention him?

  • zombiepete@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    Ā·
    2 years ago

    Even though I wouldnā€™t be terribly surprised to learn that this is the case, I think youā€™re making a lot of assumptions based on little to no evidence. That the notoriously private Worf didnā€™t mention Alexander to anyone doesnā€™t necessarily provide that they have a strained relationship; Alexander may very well have died and Worf suffers in silence over it. Conversely, Alexander may be a prominent member of the House of Martok and is well-known in the Federation so no one needs to ask about him.

    Iā€™d like to think that Worfā€™s emotional maturity means that he probably did or does maintain a better relationship with Alexander, and itā€™s simply that he didnā€™t come up in the context of what was going on in the story.

    • majicwalrus@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      Ā·
      2 years ago

      I would like to believe that as well, but we are left with very little to make us believe that other than good will towards Worf. It seems like a particularly glaring oversight to have the season of Picard featuring Picard and Beverlyā€™s long lost son, Geordiā€™s daughters, memories of Thaddeus Rikerā€™s death, and the first time weā€™ve seen Worf in a long time not explicitly mention at least once that Worf is also a member of the parent club.

      Instead what we do see are exclusively episodes where Worfā€™s relationship with his son is not treated as a core part of Worfā€™s character - even attempts to reconcile go basically no where.

      A single line to Enterprise-D crew about how Alexander is the commander of an entire Klingon battle fleet now and that fills Worf with great pride would have solidified that the characters reconciled. Hell, itā€™s kind of weird that no one asks about Alexander since all the Enterprise-D crew readily know that Worf has a son. But instead, just like the writers, Worf has apparently forgotten that he has a child and so is written as though he doesnā€™t have one.

      • Equals@startrek.websiteOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        Ā·
        2 years ago

        It seems like a particularly glaring oversight to have the season of Picard featuring Picard and Beverlyā€™s long lost son, Geordiā€™s daughters, memories of Thaddeus Rikerā€™s death, and the first time weā€™ve seen Worf in a long time not explicitly mention at least once that Worf is also a member of the parent club.

        The fact that the oversight is so glaring is what makes me think that we are supposed to read in to the vague line about ā€œsacrificeā€, and that we are supposed to infer that itā€™s about Alexander. Itā€™s subtle and I think itā€™s unsatisfying narratively, but I think that was the intent.

        As to why they didnā€™t just make an offhand reference like ā€œAlexander is in command of an entire fleetā€ā€¦ Iā€™m guessing they felt (rightly or wrongly) that it would be weird not to do more with the idea of ā€œWorf as a fatherā€, soā€¦ they opted to quietly make him Not A Father (Anymore). Which, to be clear, Iā€™m not saying was a good decision, Iā€™m just trying to do some tea leaves reading here.

        • majicwalrus@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          Ā·
          2 years ago

          This is a good point and perhaps there is unused footage that mentions Alexander in more detail which would understandably be cut out if they werenā€™t willing to lean in on it. Itā€™s easier for us to forget Alexander existed and to wonder ā€œmaybe he diedā€ than to waste lines on that kind of backstory - at least in some writerā€™s opinion which I could see an argument for.