• LanyrdSkynrd [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    I think Trump hoped January 6th to be that sort of event, but it failed miserably. It failed because the only people willing to do anything about it were the chuds that showed up to his rally. They lacked any kind of shared political theory or goals. Some were there to have fun, some were there because they believed in Qanon, some wanted a christofacist dictatorship, and some thought they could fix the “voting irregularities” and go back to being a representative democracy. All those same impediments exist today for any kind of dismantling driven by citizens.

    It could still happen if Trump suddenly got institutional backing for such a thing, like from the military, courts and big business, but it seems super unlikely. The bourgeoisie gets everything they need from both parties, why send America into economic chaos to keep one dipshit in charge?

    • Vampire [any]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      It could still happen if Trump suddenly got institutional backing

      Well that’s called being elected, becoming commander in chief

      • miz [any, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        but that’s not really backing, that’s legitimacy theater. a big enough faction has to back you to be a candidate nominee though

      • EmoThugInMyPhase [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        And? Allende was elected president and commander in chief and got disposed by his own general. Pakistan’s military sabotage Khan’s government. Titles are just words until you have influence. Trump has immense influence, but not enough to deploy troops to stop voters