0x815@feddit.de to Technology@beehaw.org · 1 year agoAI-Created Art Isn’t Copyrightable, U.S. Judge Says in Ruling That Could Give Hollywood Studios Pausewww.hollywoodreporter.comexternal-linkmessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1198arrow-down12cross-posted to: becomeme@sh.itjust.worksfuturology@futurology.todayaicopyright@lemm.eetech@kbin.socialnews@kbin.socialtech@kbin.socialghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zonetechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1196arrow-down1external-linkAI-Created Art Isn’t Copyrightable, U.S. Judge Says in Ruling That Could Give Hollywood Studios Pausewww.hollywoodreporter.com0x815@feddit.de to Technology@beehaw.org · 1 year agomessage-square37fedilinkcross-posted to: becomeme@sh.itjust.worksfuturology@futurology.todayaicopyright@lemm.eetech@kbin.socialnews@kbin.socialtech@kbin.socialghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zonetechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squareGormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up21·1 year agoHaving some form of copyright IMO is good, like you said putting the line somewhere. Current copyright is fucked (lifetime of the artist plus 70 years) The way it used to be (14 years) wasn’t bad IMO
Having some form of copyright IMO is good, like you said putting the line somewhere.
Current copyright is fucked (lifetime of the artist plus 70 years)
The way it used to be (14 years) wasn’t bad IMO