cmeerw@programming.dev to C++@programming.devEnglish · edit-22 months agoThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ blueprintwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up138arrow-down12cross-posted to: programming@programming.devrust@lemmit.online
arrow-up136arrow-down1external-linkThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ blueprintwww.theregister.comcmeerw@programming.dev to C++@programming.devEnglish · edit-22 months agomessage-square38fedilinkcross-posted to: programming@programming.devrust@lemmit.online
minus-squareHerzenschein@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-22 months agoWhile the summary + interview The Register did was decent, when you read the actual paper, the proposal is way more interesting. Not a fan of mut instead of just plain mutable, though. Also I sure hope the compiler messages for this feature won’t be like the circle examples in the proposal in the end.
While the summary + interview The Register did was decent, when you read the actual paper, the proposal is way more interesting.
Not a fan of mut instead of just plain mutable, though.
Also I sure hope the compiler messages for this feature won’t be like the circle examples in the proposal in the end.