“These attacks violate the human right to life, absent any indication that the victims posed an imminent lethal threat to anyone else at the time.”

    • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      I will go with “random attacks on civilians intended to instill fear in a populace”. Now you go

        • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Are you the same guy who sent me a link and called me an idiot for not reading it even though it supported my point?

            • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              It’s just that I have no idea what you are talking about, you have been wrong several times, and refuse to clarify what you mean about anything. Basically this is a dead end conversation.

                • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  I have no idea what you are talking about and I stand by my definition of terrorism.

                  Edit: also just noticed that you’ve been taking the time to down vote all of my comments. Lol.

                  • Madison420@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    Then neither country is taking terrorist act.

                    Boo hoo? What’s your point aside from crying about you and m that had no bearing on how wrong you are