• reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It costs more than $10k a year per person to provide housing as pointed out in the cross posted thread.

    • SeattleRain@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not if the government built and ran the homes. Public housing works, it just got it’s funding gutted by Reagan. And how can you put a price tag and cleaner and safer communities.

      • cryptiod137@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        California is building housing at $1000/sqft, the city of San Francisco spends $100,000/year per homeless person

        If it was somehow just as easy to build public housing, why wouldn’t they?

        • SeattleRain@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          The tweet only talks about the cost of housing homeless people. Homeless people have other needs like mental and medical care. And $1000/sqft isn’t the norm and the tweet is generalizing about housing costs throughout the country, not the CA. You just seem dead set and making public housing seem untenable. And they don’t build public housing because it lowers rent for all renters. There’s no floor to housing so every renter can be implicitly threatened with the specter of complete destitution, holding them ransom for the ridiculous rents we have now.