• Soup@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is the only logical answer for this. Otherwise- their deaths mean nothing.

    • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s not logical? It doesn’t even have a legal basis.

      The real logical answer to bad government management is the French one - protest

      • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        And if protests dont work as they often dont, then what? The guillotine. Thats a french thing nest pas?

        • Alph4d0g
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          We might be headed toward the same conditions that spawned the French revolution. I’m not in favor of that but once the wealth transfer gets to a certain point there’s historical president to draw upon.

          • Soup@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            That isn’t going to happen. And in the very off chance that it does- the government is guaranteed the win, and the people will suffer.

            Greatly.

            • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              The government is made of people. Those people might refuse to do their jobs too.

              A protest is SUBSTANTIALLY more likely to happen than the original suggestion of charging state lawmakers with murder. There’s no murder charge that would qualify.

              • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                Reckless endangerment and manslaughter.

                They were warned that women would die due these laws and they didn’t listen. They recklessly put those laws there and people died… resulting in manslaughter.

                I’d prefer homicide too, but I feel like manslaughter charges would stick better because you don’t have to prove intent, just that someone died because of their actions.

              • Soup@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                Riiiiight. Well, have fun storming the castle. Just don’t make a mess on my street, okay? I don’t want to have to clean that shit up.

                  • Soup@lemmy.cafe
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    And there it is! Internet activists calling people they know nothing about “cowards”. Typical lemmy rhetoric.

                    You’re going to have to forgive me if I walk away from this conversation having felt a touch of second-hand embarrassment for you. That’s just me being me.

                    I’m just empathic that way.

    • dubious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      the logical answer is something else entirely. definitely don’t hold your breath for the state to make them accountable.

      • Soup@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I I’m not. Because the american government follows no logic whatsoever.