cross-posted from: https://lemmy.crimedad.work/post/12162

Why? Because apparently they need some more incentive to keep units occupied. Also, even though a property might be vacant, there’s still imputed rental income there. Its owner is just receiving it in the form of enjoying the unit for himself instead of receiving an actual rent check from a tenant. That imputed rent ought to be taxed like any other income.

  • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    You know, so long as we can agree that lack of supply is the core issue, the rest of all that is really just details haha. I’m not hugely confident of public housing’s track record in the US (though there’s obviously a lot that went into that), but whether it’s new public housing or just loosening zoning and allowing the market to actually meet demand, I don’t really care so long as there are units.

    • Olgratin_Magmatoe@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      You know, so long as we can agree that lack of supply is the core issue

      It’s one of the core issues. I think there is a lot more baked into this, but if this is one of the things we can agree on then so be it.

      I’m not hugely confident of public housing

      While I do think public housing is a part of the solution, and has a lot of mistakes to learn from, I think co-ops should be the main workhorse/end goal for government built housing.

      public housing or just loosening zoning and allowing the market to actually meet demand, I don’t really care so long as there are units.

      I say, all of the above. Any possible way to increase the supply is a good thing.