A rare reversal on a company’s forced arbitration clause.

  • stinerman [Ohio]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m not a lawyer so I have no clue about the legal issues, but I’m more than happy to put my name to anything that costs a corporation money. I don’t even need the money. They can take it out of Valve’s pocket and burn it for all I care.

    • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      Like, I don’t want to sound like a corporate shill, but Valve has been the most consumer friendly corporation I’ve ever seen. Even if they do meet the criteria for a monopoly, they are the model of what a company that finds itself as The Monopoly should be, in my opinion.

      I have no intent to sign up for this “lawsuit”, even though I stand to gain some $500 from it. I hope Steam lives long and prospers.

    • HeavyRaptor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Great, you should focus your efforts on different companies, Valve is one of the few good ones (for now).

    • NutinButNet@hilariouschaos.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Most of these seem to just put most of the money into corporations run by lawyers, so that doesn’t make much sense. Transferring money from one corp to the next.

      Millions going to the lawyers and pennies going to the actual victims of the suit.