• IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m not sure that’s correct, check out how many calories you’d have to burn just to cover those in a can of soda.

    • Brcht@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think walking does way more than burning calories though.

      For one it gives you a lot more awareness of your physical condition, if you go everywhere by car you may barely notice your weight has doubled.

      Secondly I find any physical activity, especially running or walking, helps to combat urges for stuff like snacking.

      • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        Sure, that may be true although I’d push back on your assertion that people somehow won’t notice they’ve added 100lbs unless they walk everywhere.

        The main issue is that processed foods are very high in calories and low in everything that is good for you and these foods are absolutely everywhere in the US. Work meetings frequently have a box of donuts on the table (700 calories each) huge sodas are common, coffees are more like a dessert than a drink, etc.

        According to my watch if I do a 15 minute walk with some light jogging that’s around 120 calories. I’d have to do that twice to cancel out a single can of soda.

        • Brcht@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Yes maybe ‘notice’ 100lbs gain is a strong word, but you don’t fully realize it until you actually start wheezing doing something you used to consider normal. If your only exercise is walking from the car to your desk job and back you may just chalk it down to being a little out of shape.

          The main issue is that processed foods are very high in calories and low in everything that is good for you and these foods are absolutely everywhere in the US.

          Definitely, that is the main issue. I’m just saying the benefts (even just the weigh-control benefits) of walking are more than the calories spent.

          Walking is a very low intensity exercise that will not burn a lot of calories, but is it’s the only exercise you get it’s a whole lot better than nothing.

      • nilloc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        I thought humans were notoriously efficient walkers, so we don’t burn that many calories that way?

        The problem is partly the culture, but largely the design of our suburbs and sprawl.

        Increased density and public transit are cool, but until there’s laws about not cutting down that “empty” patch of trees, or paving over that old farmland, developers are gonna make shitty sprawl, and cars will be necessary.

        I mean it’s so bad and people are so cheap about it that they choose forced HOAs to maintain culdesacs and roads instead of properly funding public services with taxes.

      • BassTurd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        How fast do you think weight is gained or how long do you think people spend in cars that gaining an excessive amount of weight is a surprise? No arguments about walking being healthier, but for most people, time in the car isn’t that significant.

        • Brcht@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          If, in your whole day, you never walk more than 100 meters at a time (likely, if you go by car everywhere) you may not notice the weight gain for years.

          If you live in a place with an elevator or on the ground floor, get your food delivered or get it at a drive-in, do most of your shopping online, go to places with parking lots, where you just walk maybe 20-30 meters before you sit down, you’ll not notice your health is going to shit.

          • BassTurd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            As someone that lives in the world you’re describing and drives everywhere, you’re wrong. Weight doesn’t just all of the sudden exist. Walking 40ft instead of 300ft twice a day is not going to make a noticeable difference. Again walking is healthier, but nobody has ever driven, gotten really fat, and then wondered what happened.

            • Brcht@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Walking 40ft instead of 300ft twice a day is not going to make a noticeable difference

              No but walking 1 km from/to the station or going by bike certainly is. As is walking during holidays or whatnot.

              Most people who gain weight do realize it by feeling it rather than by looking at the mirror, especially since it is a very slow process. If you feel the struggle walking 300 feet and you don’t have other issues, you’ve probably gained a lot of weight already.

            • Strykker@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              My guy, people in Europe who walk aren’t walking 300ft in a day, they are walking probably 2-3km daily, those are the kinds of distance where you would start to really feel the effect of having gained 30-40 pounds that you might not realize if you walk like 300 ft in a day