• riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Those panels are supplying the grid anyway and with angles like this in their lifespan they are going to generate mega watt hours less then their correctly installed counterparts. In a perfect world (with wider solar adoption) this would be considered a waste of panels.

    • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Panels are cheap, and the single-phase inverters they are using are too.

      Even with the odd placement, they are going to yield a few hundred watts per panel on sunny days. Since it’s so low most of it will be going directly to household consumption.

      This doesn’t move the needle much globally speaking, but it’s also a tiny investment and (especially in Germany when even in sunny days the carbon footprint of what comes out of the grid is horrendous) it significantly lowers household carbon emissions.

      • riodoro1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Thats why I added the part about perfect world.

        In it his house would be supplied from those panels anyway but much better placed.

        And panels and inverters are cheap, but so is gasoline. Multiply it a bunch of times and the resources wasted get us another catastrophe.

        • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Orientation doesn’t matter as much as you’d think on overcast days. And this is Germany. Also, transmission is a thing. So unless your “perfect world” also includes perfect weather and upgraded physics, you are just not really making sense.

          In the end you’re just yet another person ginning up excuses for inaction by distorting facts. And god knows we good plenty of those.