• basmati@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    19 hours ago

    So you at least admit it’s a problem on both sides, you’re just blind to scale. You’re better than most Dems this election cycle at least.

    • celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It’s not a problem because some small group of people online who are idolizing Kamala Harris aren’t going to turn violent and start a riot if she loses.

    • IGuessThisIsForNSFW@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Look, I’m not trying to cause a stink here, I just don’t understand what you’re getting at. Are you implying that the amount of Kamala stans is comparable to the amount of Trump stans? Or are you saying that because you can find at least one zealot for each party, this does technically apply to both parties?

      • basmati@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Either you’re sealioning or you’re purposefully misunderstanding, in either case either hope when Harris either loses or proves she’s more right wing than bush, you get deprogrammed and join us again.

          • IGuessThisIsForNSFW@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            To be fair, this was the kind of response I was expecting, I was just hoping to at least understand what they were going on about. Had to google sealioning, which is apparently repeatedly asking for proof while feigning politeness. I didn’t ask for proof, I just wanted them to clarify what they were saying and they still thought I was doing it, so I guess I should have been more rude?