• Sestren@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    19 hours ago

    How does the title victimize Google?.. It literally just summarizes the article, and then in the first sentence of the actual article they flat out call Google an illegal monopoly.

    • catsup@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      “Must crack open”

      crack open has negative connotations. “Must allow” is a much more neutral way to phrase it.

      “Epic Judge”

      The judge isn’t epic’s, it’s just the judge that happens to be dealing with this case.

      • vrek@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Ok, they got me on the second one… I was seriously wondering how epic had their own judge and it wasn’t conflict of interest.

        • 佐藤カズマ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Welcome to America, where the judges might as well wear racing suits full of sponsors. Actually, that might be an improvement on the status quo.