• Madlaine@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Because he’s legally innocent until proven otherwise and therefore has not forfeit his eligibility yet.

    There is a legal process, and it should be followed.

    Just because many people think he is guilty doesn’t mean that the normal juristical procesd can be skipped.

    He will lose eligibility early enough (i hope)

    • Dojan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Good point. To be fair, if the bullshit he’s openly admitted to doing, and been seen doing, isn’t enough to stop him I don’t see why a couple of accusations would.

    • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not sure getting convicted technically removes his eligibility either. From what I’ve read, he could theoretically run from prison, win, and pardon himself at least at the federal level. That won’t help with state charges, but it’s a super fun constitutional crisis to consider!

      • Aa!@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        And there’s technically nothing legally preventing a state-convicted felon from getting elected while serving his sentence in state prison.

        It’s ridiculous that we’re even this close to finding out if it could happen