The only numbers I will ever spell are one and zero, and only when using them as a pronoun, or for emphasis, respectively.

Is there ever a reason to not to use symbols when dealing with numbers? Why would “fourteen whatevers” ever be preferable to “14 whatevers”. It’s just so much easier to read numbers as symbols, not spelled out.

(Caveat, not including multipliers, like “273 billion”).

  • Laser@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    (Caveat, not including multipliers, like “273 billion”).

    Billion is ambiguous, better use powers of 10, e.g. 273e9 or 273e12, depending on which one you mean

    Or use SI units.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Even better haha, this is also my preference, but I think most audiences wouldn’t like that, I assume.

      Edit: 239,000,000,000 is obviously an option. But I rarely see that in a newspaper.

        • MisterFrog@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I’m not a fan of how this isn’t standardised across the world either.

          It obviously isn’t a big deal, but he’s my counter argument for fun.

          Commas are the more logical option as they already serve as breaks within a sentence.

          It’s fairly common across many languages for punctuation to use commas for short breaks within a sentence, and periods/full stops to be used to finish a sentence. It’s so common because even languages that didn’t use these symbols becore, have now adopted it (Chinese comes to mind).

          Commas as a separator within the same number fit better into this existing structure, in my opinion.

          Dots being used for decimals seems more consistent with this system also, since the difference between units and negative powers feels greater than just seperating digits into groups.

          Further (without having actually looked at statistics on this, I could be wrong about this) it’s only Europe who use dots to separate groupings of digits, and commas for decimals.

          If this is in fact the case, you (assuming you’re European) ought to switch to the majority’s system so we can have consistency.

          Fair is fair ;)

          Edit to add: I’m Australian

          • PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I like that you take this up just for fun 🙂

            And you provide valid arguments. As I was reading your response, I was thinking of how there can be multiple commas in a sentence but only one period. That fits your style.

            Yes I am in Europe and it’s not even standard here, for instance the Swiss use ’ as a thousands separator and I don’t know what they do for decimals.

            “My” European style is also used in Japan, and they use the metric system, but US voltage and plugs.

            We live in a messy world 🙂

            • MisterFrog@lemmy.worldOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Swiss use ’ as a thousands separator

              TIL

              Appreciate your response friend. I look forward to a day where we standardise this, but we probably never will (and that’s probably fine haha)

              As cursed number formats go, India is the worst that comes to my mind:

              • European languages: 123,456,789 (groups of 103)
              • East Asia: 1,2345,6789 (groups of 104)

              Logical smooth sailing.

              • India: 12,34,56,789

              0_0 Why must you do this to me?

              https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_numbering_system

  • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 months ago

    The real style guide is always your reader. If specific numbers may be searched for or copied, it is kinder to use symbols. If your reader is merely reading a number in conversation, it would usually be better to follow the usual style guide.

    The more you know and care for your reader, the better your writing will be.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Hi, I have no idea how I managed this, but I just saw your comments were “removed by moderator” (which is me)

      Sorry about this!

      I’m gonna double check this hasn’t been done across the board, perhaps there was some glitch

      Edit: I think this may have been an admin deleting all you comments, and my client (voyager) doesn’t differentiate.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I love the fact this proves the point, that even for emphasis (which I think the title of 1984 is fine to use), it’s LESS clear to spell it out.

      I am very thankful my company lets me write numbers and not spell it out.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Remove ambiguity at all costs!

    But if they insist I write things out:

    Ten-one Ten-two Ten-three Ten-four

    I don’t think it is clear as 11, 12, 13, 14 but hey who am I to argue?

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        You’re in an engineering community, is ten-one actually wrong?

        Consider the sequence: One, eleven, twenty-one, thirty-one, fourty-one, fifty-one… One hundred and one.

        As far as the convention of writing numbers out in words when they’re less than 10, there’s also conventions for less than 15, wikimedia uses the convention if it can be written in two words it’s optional to write it out as words.

      • MisterFrog@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Just a small note on this, style guides have all sorts of weird rules about spelling out numbers, most of which I personally think are nonsense, hence making a meme. Not necessarily just less than 10

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yeah not sure what happened to it :/ I uploaded it to Lemmy.world

      Here it is again, just for you ;)

      • MisterFrog@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Well this is ironic. Something with Voyager, perhaps? I dunno.

        It’s the bugs bunny no meme, for style guides asking you to spell out numbers under 10.