Nemeski@lemm.ee to Opensource@programming.dev · 2 months agoSF ads call out tech firms for not paying for open sourcewww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up1154arrow-down12cross-posted to: opensource@lemmy.mlbrainworms@lemm.eetechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1152arrow-down1external-linkSF ads call out tech firms for not paying for open sourcewww.theregister.comNemeski@lemm.ee to Opensource@programming.dev · 2 months agomessage-square22fedilinkcross-posted to: opensource@lemmy.mlbrainworms@lemm.eetechnology@lemmy.world
minus-square🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down7·edit-22 months ago makes thing for free Doesn’t get paid for it Why not make a license that makes it free if you contribute to development and paid for if you don’t?
minus-squaredontgooglefinderscult@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoBecause for those using it non commercially it would be prohibitively expensive.
Why not make a license that makes it free if you contribute to development and paid for if you don’t?
Because for those using it non commercially it would be prohibitively expensive.