• BabyTurtles [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    You neatly sidestepped the question. Capitol puts everyone in danger, that isn’t special. Would you do the special honors of placing your child in front of a firing squad if it meant you could say that you stood firm in your ideals?

      • BabyTurtles [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’m ignoring them because aren’t good faith? I didn’t say “Jack Smith is literally in this situation”, I’m just pointing out how easy it is for armchair revolutionaries to snear from the sidelines when it’s not their necks on the line.

          • BabyTurtles [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            I found yours, yours is just like gibberish.

            You are here presenting the situation as if it was a sudden development, rather than a known risk from the start. You are also presenting it as a definite certainty. Neither of these presentations are correct.

            No, risk is a spectrum, like everything. The level of risk changes based on the situation. Jack found it to be an acceptable level of risk, the situation changed, the risk got higher, and it was no longer acceptable to him.

            I was presenting a hypothetical situation where risk was the absolute maximum because I want people to use their heads and think about it, and maybe break out of the snearing circlejerk bubble for a second.