Yes, believable, from all the payment methods available, Greenpeace would choose the most fucking inefficient one, that wastes 700 kWh for a single transaction, that’s 100 households!

  • Magnetic_dudOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    For a generic non personalized spam, IMHO it would be too expensive to generate and track millions of wallets. They could have placed a tracking pixel for much less (they didn’t, the email is just plain text)

    If then it’s some targeted campaign, then yes, a dedicated BTC address makes sense as you said