• radiosimian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You know there’s a crapload more reactors than Fukukishima, right? Like over 70% of France’s energy demands are met with nuclear power.

    The issue here is that you are parroting the devisive argument that investors in oil have been putting out for decades. You are also ignoring the harm that outputting millions of tonnes of carbon-based effluent has on the world’s population as a whole.

    Gram for gram nuclear is safer and your horror stories should be discounted. Retort:

    2023 Marco Pol…Sweden, Karlsh…22 October 2023Lennard en z’n …United Kingdo…26 March 20232023 Princess …Philippines, Pol…28 February 20232022 Keystone …United States, …7 December 2022

    Cool, keep on with your ‘nuclear bad’ narrative. It does objectively less harm than carbon-based energy.