L4sBot@lemmy.worldMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agoGoogle Removes ‘Pirate’ URLs from Users’ Privately Saved Linkstorrentfreak.comexternal-linkmessage-square108fedilinkarrow-up1613arrow-down127file-textcross-posted to: tech@kbin.socialbecomeme@sh.itjust.workshackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanspiracy@lemmit.onlinetechnews@radiation.partyhackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1586arrow-down1external-linkGoogle Removes ‘Pirate’ URLs from Users’ Privately Saved Linkstorrentfreak.comL4sBot@lemmy.worldMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square108fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: tech@kbin.socialbecomeme@sh.itjust.workshackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanspiracy@lemmit.onlinetechnews@radiation.partyhackernews@derp.foo
minus-squaretomich@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20arrow-down3·10 months agoIt’s not on bookmarks. Is on collections(a different thing) that are public, shareable and technically hosted by Google. This whole thing has been overblown by not fact checking.
minus-squareGrimy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·10 months agoIt deleted them from public and private collections. If google was taking out mentions of Tiananmen Square at China’s request, would you be okay with it?
minus-squaremac@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·10 months agoThat’s a giant leap and massively different.
minus-squareGrimy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·10 months agoBoth are blatant forms of censorship, one is extreme but the principal is the exact same.
It’s not on bookmarks. Is on collections(a different thing) that are public, shareable and technically hosted by Google. This whole thing has been overblown by not fact checking.
It deleted them from public and private collections.
If google was taking out mentions of Tiananmen Square at China’s request, would you be okay with it?
That’s a giant leap and massively different.
Both are blatant forms of censorship, one is extreme but the principal is the exact same.