BrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Technology@lemmy.zipEnglish · 1 年前HDMI 2.2 will be announced next month — and it may require a new cablewww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square27linkfedilinkarrow-up176arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up176arrow-down1external-linkHDMI 2.2 will be announced next month — and it may require a new cablewww.theverge.comBrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Technology@lemmy.zipEnglish · 1 年前message-square27linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·1 年前Display Port is going to be far better
minus-squareAnticorp@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 年前Display Port isn’t typically an option for home entertainment centers and TVs.
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 年前You know It sucks but HDMI is DRM and thus media conglomerate friendly. They media companies hate open tech.
minus-squarePsythik@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前I would use DisplayPort if display manufacturers would put them on decent sized screens! I compute from the couch (because fuck back-breaking office chairs) and I have yet to find a display larger than 32" with a DisplayPort. They’re all HDMI-only.
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 年前I like the display port to HTMI cables. It isn’t a perfect solution but it has more flexibility. You do need a supported output device.
Display Port is going to be far better
Display Port isn’t typically an option for home entertainment centers and TVs.
You know
It sucks but HDMI is DRM and thus media conglomerate friendly. They media companies hate open tech.
I would use DisplayPort if display manufacturers would put them on decent sized screens! I compute from the couch (because fuck back-breaking office chairs) and I have yet to find a display larger than 32" with a DisplayPort. They’re all HDMI-only.
I like the display port to HTMI cables. It isn’t a perfect solution but it has more flexibility.
You do need a supported output device.