• Jaded@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Big corporations are fueling the concern. The more restrictions that come out on it, the harder it is for small and open source developers to join in.

      Legislations just widen their moat, nothing else.

        • Jaded@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Most legislation being pushed seems to concern the use of scraped copyrighted material in the training data. There is no open source software like stable diffusion and the llama llm if this data becomes unavailable to them. This would put companies like google, microsoft and adobe at an insane advantage since they already own all that data.

          • lasagna@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Some specific legislations then? Would be worth pointing them out. I’m no expert in the topic and I doubt most people here are. Your statement makes you seem against legislating it at all.

            • Jaded@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I just haven’t seen any talk of legislation that wouldn’t harm the small players and us, the consumers.

              I’d like to see legislation so the windfall profits from AI (and our economy in general) is shared more equally. Stifling AI directly is just bad news imo.