EDIT: no, I don’t sympathize with nazis (neither I sympathize with those who call everyone nazi when they’re losing an argument ;)

  • AlpineSteakHouse [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    The word ‘social’ is referring to ‘socialism’ and so is the relation between ‘democracy’ and ‘democratic’.

    I guess social security = socialism security in your world? Social welfare programs are not socialism and if your political education included anything beyond Elizabeth Warren’s policy page you’d know that.

    • mustardman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      No, social policies are not socialism, however, they do generally benefit the working class.

      You guys are so worried about centrists that you are ignoring the fact that the US had a far right coup attempt less than three years ago.

        • mustardman
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          No it has not been far right since 1776. I guess when you make up facts it’s easy to prove your point though.

          By the way, when’s the glorious peoples revolution supposed to begin? More importantly, where are the people???

          • Read Liberalism A Counter History or shut up about shit you don’t understand.

            The people already revolted in the worlds largest country and their success will convince people to make similar steps once it’s made obvious you’re being fucked by your far right regimes. The people are hungering in most of the world and they will stand up you brain wormed fucker

            • mustardman
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Read this book I just read last month or you don’t know anything!

              It’s funny, no matter how many reading assignments I actually partake in, it’s never enough. Perhaps your movement would be more successful if you spent less time alienating anyone right of Ho Chi Minh.

                • mustardman
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Funny you mention that. Whenever I do cite any “theory” that I have read, you well-read individuals somehow always disappear and avoid discussing anything. I’m sure you’ll either A) do the same thing or B) move the goalposts all the way to Laos/Cambodia.

                  https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/2650764

                  • Lol is that your best fuckin example? You didn’t cite Marx lol you just misunderstood an analysis for a method and made a shit argument. You didn’t deserve a good reply and dont now. I’m all for whatever analyses come out to peacefully move forward, but you’re just preserving the current world for your benefit not trying to prevent some deaths or something. Millions die yearly to preventable causes which would end with global socialism.