• Tinidril@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Let’s have some reflection and not pick the timescale to suit a narrative.

    You picked the timescale of two elections. Then I expanded it to three and that was out of bounds, but five is fine again? You make it difficult to assume you are arguing in good faith.

    The “habitual losers” won 3 of the last 5

    Apparently you missed the point that the presidency isn’t the only office that matters. Anyways, in the course of winning 3/5, Democrats lost the working class and gen-z. That indicates a trend.

    I would also argue that Obama’s first win shouldn’t count. Hillary was the establishment candidate and she lost to Obama running on a reform platform of “change”. Then he got elected and suddenly became just another manager of the status quo. In the course of Obama’s two terms, Democrats lost over 1000 seats across the country. Even in victory, Obama was massive loser for the Democrats.

    Obama held on well enough while Republicans kept ran establishment candidates. That ended when Trump ran a right wing populist campaign. He was full of shit, but he was the only candidate actually talking to most of the country.

    Democrats won in 2020 because of Trump’s obvious mishandling of the COVID crisis. Even so, it was a close race in three critical swing states.

    Why did they lose? I don’t know

    They lost because we are living in a populist age. We have record income inequality and an economy that feels more and more like a scam every day. People see that and want someone to blame. Republicans have villains and narratives and Democrats don’t. Democrats could put the blame where it belongs (with Wall Street and corporate America) but they won’t. That leaves a vacuum where Republicans blame minorities. A bigoted narrative beats no narrative.