• SyperStronkHero@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    135
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a great game but there IS a catch that wasn’t mentioned.

    The devs plan on implementing one of the more intrusive Anti-Cheats (Face It Anti Cheat) which doesn’t work on Linux which also stops all Steam Deck users from playing. It also forces you to disable virtualization on windows. I can’t recall the last time I had to go into bios to disable an option to turn off important windows features.

    According to their stream, it’s non-negotiable and will be added regardless of what the community wants. But they did mention that community servers would be able to pick which Anti Cheat they wanted to use?

    • HER0@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      1 year ago

      But they did mention that community servers would be able to pick which Anti Cheat they wanted to use?

      As I understand, there are three tiers to this:

      • Official servers will use FaceIt exclusively.
      • Servers rented from official partners will have the choice of FaceIt or EAC.
      • Community-run servers will only be able to use EAC, and won’t be hooked into the global progression system.

      One of the many problems with FaceIt is that the server-side component is not allowed to be freely distributed, which is why community-run servers won’t have the option to use it.

      Personally, there is no way I am buying this unless if they reverse their plans to use FaceIt.

    • Jamie@jamie.moe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      From what I read, it also requires Secure Boot to be enabled. I played the game for 90 minutes before reading about the anti-cheat change, fortunately I didn’t hit 2 hours and took a refund.

    • Tokeli@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      As someone that uses virtual machines frequently, I look at my like 16 hours in the game. Fuck. I hope they don’t do that, this is the Battlefield I’ve been wanting for years. ;-;

  • ultrasquid@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    1 year ago

    I considered it, but am now avoiding it because they’re going to add a Linux-incompatible anticheat.

  • Dead@keylog.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was about to buy this but apparently they are planning to change their current anti cheat software to FaceIt which does not support Linux. EAC is still used for upcoming selfhosted servers but ranking up is disabled. I’d rather not feel like being considered as a second class citizen so I’ll have to skip for now.

    Other than that the game looks fun. I prefer to look in to the current state of the game rather than the promises of future content (which kind of contradicts my anti cheat point but eh), and I feel like the current price would be worth it even though it’s an early access game.

    • thann@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      yeah, Im enjoying it right now, but if they choose to make my experience not playable, I would expect a refund =/

  • quortez@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 year ago

    I love to see indie games pop off. I hate to see Linux-hostile anti-cheats. C’est a la vie.

    • wallmenis@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dafaq you are talking about? I see people have no problem running the game with and older version of proton.

      • Demacish
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        The devs plan on implementing a anti-cheat system that makes it incompatible with Linux and virtualization on Windows

  • RecluseGamer@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been having a lot of fun with it. Even if I only get a few weeks or months until they add FACEIT, it’s worth the $15.

        • Riskable@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          FACEIT is yet another completely useless, doesn’t-actually-work, trust-the-client anti-cheating tool. Basically, it makes it so that cheaters (and the game publisher) can claim cheating isn’t happening because, “there’s an anti-cheat tool” but in reality it doesn’t stop actual cheaters.

          The entire purpose of anti-cheat tools appears to be to stop casual Linux gamers from being able to play the game. Microsoft has a big part in it as well because the very same intentional vulnerabilities in Windows that hackers use to install undetectable rootkits are what get used by anti-cheat software.

          If Microsoft wanted they could close those vulnerabilities by making all privilege levels above administrator (of which Windows has two which is insane) inaccessible to anyone but Microsoft. Instead they just collect money from 3rd party vendors to sign their driver encryption keys, inherently trusting those vendors not to make software with vulnerabilities. It’s a recipe for insecurity and Microsoft likes it that way. It acts as a form of vendor lock-in.

          Anti-cheat tools pretty much all work with the same basic assumption: Trust the client. What’s the first rule of network programming? Never trust the client!

        • Snowmonkey@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          From what I understand, FACEIT is a “better” anti cheat that the developers want to use to replace the current Easy Anti Cheat. Their current implementation of Easy Anti Cheat supports Linux and Steam Deck while FACEIT does not, and will not support Linux

      • Eelviny@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly though, I hate it but I do kind of get it. If this game gets overrun by hackers in its prime, the game dies and I’d really like to see this survive long term as this is the kind of pricing model I’d like to support. Can’t have everything perfect.

        But it will only make sense if FACEIT achieves that goal. Time will tell, and I’ll keep my windows dual boot for gaming for now.

  • smart_boy@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    The game itself is a workmanlike Battlefield with a few oddball choices. I hope they never “fix” the vaulting behaviour that lets you break a 20-storey fall and make massive jumps across rooftops.

    But I’ve specifically been having a lot of fun with the proximity chat. Remarkably robust, has an opt-in “broadcast your mic for a few seconds when you die” feature, and somehow isn’t a sluice of slurs / edgy crap / etc (at least in my experience).

    The anticheat news is really depressing though. Cheaters are out there and will come to this game, and EAC at least has a reputation of being quite weak. We’re not allowed to have nice things.

  • unsunny@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Looks interesting; one of the things keeping me away from some FPS games is the sheer amount of micro transactions. I’d spend 15 and get something good and fair for everyone who plays instead of being asked to put in another purchase every few minutes!

    • 🗑️😸@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been playing this game a lot the past few days. it’s just plain fun. A nice refreshing FPS in the era of BRs and battle passes.

  • Zook3y@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a great game! Runs super smoothly and it’s got a lot of great QoL features. $15 is a steal

    • Illumilux@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      The refund period isn’t a hard set in stone thing. Send support a request and it’s likely to be granted. When tlou came out plenty of people with way more than 2 hours got refunds.

      • jgrim of Sublinks@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m mostly concerned about not being able to play it on Steamdeck anymore. I can still play it on PC. But doesn’t seem like a good choice to have that anti cheat. Thanks, gotta think about it.

    • SyperStronkHero@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      In the servers browser I’ve noticed some community ones but there are only a few and mostly in different regions. Hopefully they will open it up for more players to host soon.

  • Communist@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been playing a ton of combat master.

    F2p with no bs, I love it, and it has a proper Linux client, it even runs natively on Wayland for me.

      • Communist@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m under the impression that it automatically runs as a lan if everyone in the custom game is on the same network.

        I could be wrong.

        • ampersandrew@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hmm…not sure I like them defining that as LAN if you need an internet connection to find the other players in the first place.

          • Communist@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            you need an internet connection to add them as friends in-game, but once they’re added as friends in game it should work.

  • iNeedScissors67@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    LevelCap has a great video about how 3 guys made a better battlefield game then EA/DICE. I had fun the one night I’ve gotten to play so far but I was kind of drunk so I didn’t do very well. I’m a Battlefield player of many years and it’s the most fun I’ve had playing since 4.