• explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s not just (time now required for task)/(time previously required for task)? So if it normally costs 4 hours to get a jug of water, and we build pipes to make it cost 4 minutes, then it’s a 60x increase in efficiency.

      Bias: manufacturing engineer

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        In capitalism, you become more efficient the closer you get to producing nothing while charging infinite dollars to everyone.

        If you have to charge 1/60th or less per unit of water and the market size remains the same, your example is less efficient, even if the pipes were free.

        • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          From the short-sighted beady eyes of a soulless ghoul running a company whose sole service is to supply water: yes this would be inefficient if it costs more. From someone with just the tiniest imagination: with easier access to water, what else could we do for people?

          Once upon a time this type of vision was common, business schools did a fantastic job turning everyone into idiots.

          • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Capitalism; the people who want to provide water as cheaply as possible are out-competed by the people who want to make as much money as possible.