username@lemm.ee to AnarchyChess@sopuli.xyzEspañol · 1 day agoCHEATERlemm.eeimagemessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up1338arrow-down13
arrow-up1335arrow-down1imageCHEATERlemm.eeusername@lemm.ee to AnarchyChess@sopuli.xyzEspañol · 1 day agomessage-square25fedilink
minus-squareSnowmenMelt@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up30·1 day agoI was able to convince it otherwise and then beat it at chess in 1 move. I don’t think we have to worry about AI taking over any time soon…
minus-squarechicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·18 hours ago it gives you information that your opponent doesn’t have, which is an unfair advantage cheating against someone who doesn’t even know where their own pieces are smh
minus-squareStovetop@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·1 day agoThis is amazing comedy, if it wasn’t so sad. I almost feel bad for the confidently incorrect infantilized LLM.
minus-squareneoman4426@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up12·1 day agoUnless it’s already to the point that it’s super advanced, and it was intentionally playing dumb to lull you into a false sense of security /s
minus-squareStovetop@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 day agoSo does Meta’s AI. I also tried Microsoft’s Copilot, and surprisingly it gave me an accurate answer about checkers even after I asked a few different ways:
Google Gemini says it’s cheating too
I was able to convince it otherwise and then beat it at chess in 1 move. I don’t think we have to worry about AI taking over any time soon…
cheating against someone who doesn’t even know where their own pieces are smh
This is amazing comedy, if it wasn’t so sad. I almost feel bad for the confidently incorrect infantilized LLM.
Unless it’s already to the point that it’s super advanced, and it was intentionally playing dumb to lull you into a false sense of security /s
So does Meta’s AI.
I also tried Microsoft’s Copilot, and surprisingly it gave me an accurate answer about checkers even after I asked a few different ways: